Anthony Esolen’s “Jasper,” Volume 1, Issue 13

Magdalen College of the Liberal Arts > About > News, Events, & More > Blog > Anthony Esolen’s “Jasper,” Volume 1, Issue 13

Subscribe to Jasper.

Painting of the Day: Snap the Whip (1872) by Winslow Homer

I told my students once that if they ever saw me walking down the street singing a war song in Welsh, at the top of my lungs – Ni chaiff gelyn ladd ac ymlid, Harlech! Harlech! Cwyd iw herlid – they should remember that I know a little bit of Welsh, so they shouldn’t think anything of it. But if they ever saw me walk into a modern art museum, they’d better call for an ambulance right away. It would be a sign that I had lost my mind.

Modern art … I had a close friend named Rodney who was a boy genius at music. When Rodney was an old man he could sit at the piano and I’d tell him, “Play ‘Stardust,’” and his fingers would run over those keys all ten at a time as fast as the wings of a hummingbird. “Play ‘I’ll Take Manhattan,’” and it was the same, and if it was a couple of notes too high for me and my wife to sing, we’d ask him to move it all down a notch or two, and whoosh, he’d play it, without any sheet music in front of him. He could do that with hundreds and hundreds of songs, big-band and swing melodies on the piano or accordion.

“Rodney,” I asked him once, “what do you think of rock and roll?” I was wearing a helmet, so I could ask the question and get away with it.

Let’s just say he didn’t like it. But he got very serious. Rodney said that we used to have popular music that was rich and beautiful and intelligent. It rose up from the wellsprings of folk music and classical music. Old people and young people loved it and sang it or played it or listened to it, but all that was swept aside.

Whether Rodney was right about that or not, I think it’s certainly true of what happened to painting in America. When I look at a painting of the human face, I don’t want to see three eyes, or the nose under the chin, or a tooth coming out of somebody’s ear, or a lot of splashes on a canvas that look as if your dog Buster had eaten some paintballs and then puked them up. I don’t have anything against Buster. And it isn’t just that the stuff offends my humanity and my common sense. It’s like what Rodney said about music. We used to have a rich tradition, full of life, and now we don’t.

So I urge my readers to go find that tradition again. Here’s a good man to start with, especially if we’re thinking of children: Winslow Homer (1836-1910). He wasn’t just sentimental. He didn’t paint only children. Check out his paintings of men at work on or near the sea. They look as if they might dash you with salt water, they are so alive, with the smell of the ocean in them and the bold broad blues of the sea and the sky and the tan and gold of the beach. Mary Cassatt is our best painter of mothers with children and babies. Winslow Homer is our best painter of boys and girls in action.

There sure are a lot to choose from: boys gathering clams on the shore; two boys in a field, one sitting and one lying down, looking out into the distance; girls with baskets under a ripe apple tree; a girl in a hammock, reading a book; a boy in the shade of a tree at noonday, lying barefoot on the ground, his dog beside him; three boys enjoying a couple of watermelons they have filched from the neighbor’s farm, one of them looking over his shoulder, because he thinks the farmer might catch them; a young man with a hunting rifle, posted in a tree; boys on a fishing boat; and this painting of a schoolyard recess, Snap the Whip.

For those of my readers who have never been boys or never been outdoors, Snap the Whip was a game that kids would play, in the days when there were kids and they played. It’s simple. A group of kids grab each other’s hands in a long line, and then they run this way and that, and the idea is to gain momentum and then dig your feet in and change your direction, so that the “whip” that you all make will snap – and some kids will lose hold and go flying off, often tumbling to the ground, as the two boys on the left are doing.

Why would boys do that? Because it’s fun. Running and twisting and leaping build up your heart and lungs, and the sheer strain of it builds up your back and arms. You have to plant your legs like young oaks to keep sometimes from falling headfirst, and if you do fall, the rough kiss of mother Earth bruises your bones and makes them thicker and stronger. That’s the biology of it, but the boys do it because it’s fun. It’s in their nature, and their bodies and souls cry out for it.

Their minds need other things, and that’s why we have the red schoolhouse in the background, because this is recess, and, in the distance, a couple of young women seem to be looking on. They teach the boys. They don’t teach them to Snap the Whip, though. They don’t have to do that. They are there just to make sure that nothing gets out of hand, and to call them back in when it is time to go back to the lessons. But we know that these boys are outdoors constantly. You can’t be barefoot in a field unless you are outdoors constantly with bare feet, because otherwise your soles will be too tender for the pebbles and sticks and dirt. You’ll get scratches and cuts. These boys don’t, because the calluses on their feet would be good and thick. We also know that they are outdoors because of their tanned faces and straw hats and suspenders. They’re wearing clothes you wear if you grow up on a farm and do chores. All is in order.

Winslow Homer was not a religious painter. But I like his works, and they feel reverent to me, in their usual friendly way. I don’t feel the same reverence when I look at a church banner with Jesus grinning like a fun guy in a cheap cartoon. There are hills behind the boys and the schoolhouse, and a sky bloomed with clouds, and trees beginning to turn their colors, and scruffy flowers here and there. Nobody has planted those flowers; only Nature, casting her good things broadside, great and small. We know from their forms and their muscles and even their manly hats that these boys won’t be boys forever, just as those trees won’t be green forever, and just as the recess will end and the boys will have to do their schoolwork. But this, and not the schoolwork, is what real life looks like. It is play for the sake of play.

That makes it more like praising God than anything else we do all day long. We may ask somebody why he’s cleaning the rust off a pump. But we don’t ask why he’s playing ball. To ask what the point of play is, is like asking somebody what he hopes to gain out of love. If you’re in it to gain something like money, you’re not really in love. If you pray to God only what you can get out of it, you may be a calculating grownup, but you are just a rookie in the glee of praise. You need to look at those boys in the field and be wise.

View or print this issue as a pdf.

1 Response
  1. Jane Hodgins

    This is wonderful! Thanks, Dr. Esolen. I, like you, find that modern art leaves me cold. My husband and I are members of the AGO ~ Art Gallery of Ontario ~ and there are hardly any exhibits these days that interest us. Not only do the exhibits not interest us, they dispirit us: What were they THINKING? Certainly ‘not an ordered world.

Leave a Reply